{"id":184,"date":"2007-01-02T16:23:19","date_gmt":"2007-01-02T16:23:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.paulwmartin.ca\/blog\/?p=184"},"modified":"2011-07-29T16:01:59","modified_gmt":"2011-07-29T16:01:59","slug":"single-payer-health-care-in-canada-and-the-usa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.paulwmartin.ca\/blog\/?p=184","title":{"rendered":"Single-payer health care in Canada and&#8230; the USA?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\nI&#8217;m currently part-way through another round of my winter session online course on Michael Ondaatje and was responding today to a discussion board thread in which my students were talking about some of the things they know about Canada. One student brought up the health care system and I responded as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent:40pt;\">\n<span style=\"color:#21490f;\"><em>As I often tell my students, learning more about another country (and<br \/>\n<br \/>particularly one that&#8217;s as close to home geographically, culturally, and<br \/>\n<br \/>historically as Canada) can teach Americans a lot about their own<br \/>\n<br \/>country as well. As D&#8230;. pointed out, I think one of the things that<br \/>\n<br \/>should really make Americans look more critically at their own<br \/>\n<br \/>healthcare system is the lack here of universal health care, something<br \/>\n<br \/>that every other well-off country in the world enjoys. Universal health<br \/>\n<br \/>care is not &#8220;free&#8221; health care at all. Canadians pay for it in taxes and<br \/>\n<br \/>employers also pay health care premiums. However, the Canadian<br \/>\n<br \/>government still pays less per capita than the American government and<br \/>\n<br \/>the premiums paid by businesses per employee is about 10% of what UVM<br \/>\n<br \/>contributes towards my insurance.  As D&#8230; also rightly pointed out,<br \/>\n<br \/>though, the Canadian system is also far from perfect (very long wait<br \/>\n<br \/>times for particular tests, specialists etc).  Knowing about how another<br \/>\n<br \/>system works, though, is crucial to being able to see what works and<br \/>\n<br \/>doesn&#8217;t work well enough in your own system. Canadians often use the<br \/>\n<br \/>American system in that way to both argue for what we should be doing<br \/>\n<br \/>(better access, shorter wait times etc) and shouldn&#8217;t (privatized<br \/>\n<br \/>insurance etc).<\/em><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>\nWho knew that this would also be the subject of a couple of really interesting NY Times pieces over the last couple of days. In Paul Krugman&#8217;s editorial &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/select.nytimes.com\/2007\/01\/01\/opinion\/01krugman.html\">A Healthy New Year<\/a>&#8221; (which you might not be able to open without being a TimesSelect subscriber) he states that  &#8220;The U.S. health care system is a scandal and a disgrace. [. . .] In 2005, almost 47 million Americans \u00e2\u20ac\u201d including more than 8 million children \u00e2\u20ac\u201d were uninsured, and many more had inadequate insurance.&#8221;  Krugman goes on to bring up some of the points I always tell my students:\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent:40pt;\">\n<span style=\"color:#1e430e;\"><em>Some say that we can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t afford universal health care, even though every year lack of insurance plunges millions of Americans into severe financial distress and sends thousands to an early grave. But every other advanced country somehow manages to provide all its citizens with essential care. The only reason universal coverage seems hard to achieve here is the spectacular inefficiency of the U.S. health care system.<\/p>\n<p>Americans spend more on health care per person than anyone else \u00e2\u20ac\u201d almost twice as much as the French, whose medical care is among the best in the world. Yet we have the highest infant mortality and close to the lowest life expectancy of any wealthy nation. How do we do it?<\/p>\n<p>[. . .] The truth is that we can afford to cover the uninsured. What we can\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t afford is to keep going without a universal health care system.<\/em><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>\nKrugman, like Anna Bernasek&#8217;s article from this past Sunday&#8217;s NY Times entitled &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/12\/31\/business\/yourmoney\/31view.html\">Health Care Problem? Check the American Psyche<\/a>,&#8221; says that &#8220;If it were up to me, we\u00e2\u20ac\u2122d have a Medicare-like system for everyone, paid for by a dedicated tax that for most people would be less than they or their employers currently pay in insurance premiums. This would, at a stroke, cover the uninsured, greatly reduce administrative costs and make it much easier to work on preventive care.&#8221;  As Bernasek points out, the greatest obstacle to such a plan is not really the logistics of making such a drastic change but rather convincing Americans that such a system would be possible and that it would actually be to their own benefit.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nEven though &#8220;the economic case for a single-payer system is surprisingly strong&#8221; and &#8220;as demonstrated in France, Britain, Canada, Australia and other countries with functioning single-payer systems, significant savings can come without hurting the overall health of the population,&#8221; the case for a single-payer system is a hard one to make here. &#8220;Most Americans just don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t believe it can be done,&#8221; Bernasek writes. &#8220;The health care crisis may turn out to be more of a problem of ideology than economics.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>\nCanada, interestingly enough, proves to be one of the key examples Bernasek offers as to the positive aspects of the single-payer system and to people&#8217;s aversion to this idea here, which Bernasek seems to find as hard to fathom as I do.\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent:40pt;color:#1a390c;\">\n<em>Consider Canada\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s system. Professor Anderson points out that in the 1960s, Canada and the United States spent roughly the same per person on health care. Some three decades later, though, Canada spent half as much as America. How did Canada manage this? By controlling the use of medical equipment and hospital resources, which statistics show has helped Canadians keep a lid on costs without measurably compromising the overall health of the population.\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent:40pt;color:#1a390c;\">\nDespite everything that is known about the economic benefits of a single-payer system, there\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s one big stumbling block: many Americans don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t believe in it. They have heard horror stories from abroad, often spread by partisan advocates, focusing on worst-case examples. Such tales play upon the aversion of many Americans to government involvement in the economy.\n<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-indent:40pt;color:#1a390c;\">\nVictor R. Fuchs, an economics professor at Stanford and a specialist in health care economics, explained it this way: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The Canadian system is a nonstarter for the U.S. even though it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a good system for Canadians. You\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re dealing with two very different countries. We were founded on life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. They were founded on peace, order and good government. It\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s a difference of values.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/em>\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<span style=\"color:#1a390c;\"><em><br \/>\n<br \/><\/em><\/span>I, frankly, don&#8217;t see how life, liberty, and <a href=\"http:\/\/tpoh.net\/\">the pursuit of happiness<\/a> (they sure were a great band, weren&#8217;t they?) can make the idea of giving everyone in the US access to much more affordable health care while still positively affecting the bottom line a &#8220;non-starter.&#8221;  But maybe that&#8217;s just my Canadian &#8220;difference of values&#8221;&#8230;.  I don&#8217;t think so.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m currently part-way through another round of my winter session online course on Michael Ondaatje and was responding today to a discussion board thread in which my students were talking about some of the things they know about Canada. One student brought up the health care system and I responded as follows: As I often [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-184","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-canada-eh","category-us-of-eh"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.paulwmartin.ca\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.paulwmartin.ca\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.paulwmartin.ca\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.paulwmartin.ca\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.paulwmartin.ca\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=184"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.paulwmartin.ca\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.paulwmartin.ca\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=184"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.paulwmartin.ca\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=184"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.paulwmartin.ca\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=184"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}